cf-banner.jpg
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Old Field Pt Question #15886 11/01/98 08:17 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 6
T
Tom DiNardi Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
T
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 6
I picked up my Old Field Pt yesterday and upon examining it I noticed a red rectangular object underneath the tree. It's the tree towards the back left side as you look at the piece with the flag facing you. The tree that was redesigned. I can't make out what this object is since it's underneath the branches of the tree. Looks like it would have been noticeable with the old tree but the new one hides it with it's branches and leaves. Anyone have any ideas?

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15887 11/01/98 08:33 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 140
A
AlanBeckman Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 140
Looks like it might be a sled. You can see a line of footprints going up to it between the two buildings then on around the building on the left. Apparently the keepers children were just having fun in the snow.

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15888 11/01/98 08:47 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,345
RFoster Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,345
Footprints in snow....How do you know it was the "keepers children"? Did the keeper have children? Maybe some neighborhood kids. Maybe the keeper (or assistant)? Big Foot?


Ron
(CT Keeper)
Re: Old Field Pt Question #15889 11/01/98 09:43 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 140
A
AlanBeckman Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 140
Keepers children assumed because the footsteps start (end?) at the front door of the house. Assumed children because the footprints are REALLY small.

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15890 11/01/98 09:43 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I just looked at mine and although there are footprints in the snow, there is no sled or red object at all. I do think that the shovel in the snow by the backdoor of the back building was a nice touch. Also there is a bricked in window on the first floor of the lighthouse. This also shows up on an old postcard that I have (circa 1915).

[This message has been edited by thelgtkpr.]

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15891 11/02/98 09:34 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Big Foot ? .........Maybe it's the return of the Seven Foot Troll...............just a thought

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15892 11/02/98 09:40 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
News flash! The Big Billygoat Gruff knocked the Troll off the bridge and was never heard from again. And I hope the same for the 7 Foot variety as well. Pull-eeez.

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15893 11/02/98 10:19 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 88
T
tnkeeper Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 88
Curious about that bricked-in window.
Anyone know the story behind it?
Couldn't see any object under the tree on my piece.
It sits too close to the ground.

tnkeeper aka Debbie

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15894 11/03/98 06:38 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I couldn't find anything about the bricked in window (I'm sure someone out there knows the story),but I did find out that the small building behind the lighthouse was the original keeper's dwelling and once served as the Old Field Village Hall (information from-Northeast Lights by Robert G. Bachand.) Great book if you can find it. I know it was out of print.

[This message has been edited by thelgtkpr.]

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15895 11/05/98 08:25 AM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 6,801
rscroope Offline
Saint
Offline
Saint
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 6,801
The lighthouse is currently a village police station with the adjacent building a village court.
The leafless tree has still not been replaced. After looking at my HL you might need the Radio City Christmas tree to replace it.


LONG ISLAND BOB
Re: Old Field Pt Question #15896 11/07/98 08:01 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 88
T
tnkeeper Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 88
David and I, while vacationing the last few days,
had the opportunity to examine several Old Field Pts.
The red object [sled?] under the tree wasn't visible on some.
The reason for this appears to be based on 2 factors.

1- The tree is set closer to the ground on some pieces
[no trunk showing] thus concealing the sled.
Or.

2- The sled is partially covered with snow.

In the case of my piece, #381, the latter is true. Had to use
a magnifing glass. At first I thought the tree was too close to
the ground to see it, but after seeing others which shows the
sled very clearly, mine appears actually to be BURIED
in the snow. Only about the width of a toothpick!
How can this be? I mean, isn't the snow part of the mold or
is it somehow added later?
I think HL should explain these variations. I understand all this
is probably due to the replacement of the original tree, but how can
the sled be covered with snow on some pieces while clearly
visible on others?

Debbie
Trying to "dig up" the facts AND my sled!

Sorry this is so hard to read... didn't appear cut up like this on my copy.
editing didn't help.
[This message has been edited by tnkeeper.]

[This message has been edited by tnkeeper.]

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15897 11/07/98 11:43 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 2
K
Ken Thompson Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
K
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 2
I just picked up my Old Field Point, and looked for the red sled. There is a little sliver of red, but it also looks like something was shaved down so the tree would fit flush with the base. Also if you look at the new brosure that shows the piece you can see a glint of red behind the old tree

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15898 11/08/98 12:51 AM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 8,949
WackoPaul Offline
Saint
Offline
Saint
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 8,949
I shot the following pictures of my Old Field Point #93 and my wife's Old Field Point #1973. Mine has the red sled under the tree and the lower tree branches sit higher off of the snow. My wife's has just a little piece of the red sled left and the bottom branches nearly touch the snow. The following links show the differences in the tree positions of the two from slightly different angles. They also show quite a difference in the painting of two trees. The one with the whole red sled having less snow, especially on the lower branches.

http://www.harbourlights.com/brady/Tree1_5.jpg

http://www.harbourlights.com/brady/Tree2_5.jpg

http://www.harbourlights.com/brady/Tree3_5.jpg

http://www.harbourlights.com/brady/Tree4_5.jpg

http://www.harbourlights.com/brady/Tree5_5.jpg

Paul L Brady


Onward to The Land of the Midnight Sun!
Re: Old Field Pt Question #15899 11/08/98 02:46 AM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 2,300
J
JTimothyA Offline
Saint
Offline
Saint
J
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 2,300
Can you get us a little tighter shot on the sled, Paul - rumor has it labeled 'Rosebud'.

Rgds,
__
/im (great photos!)

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15900 11/08/98 10:46 AM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 8,949
WackoPaul Offline
Saint
Offline
Saint
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 8,949
For those of you that are interested in post counts and word counts (Rod), the above post about the Old Field Point replacement tree is a total 5,101 words. After all everybody knows, that a picture is worth a thousand words.

Paul


Onward to The Land of the Midnight Sun!
Re: Old Field Pt Question #15901 11/08/98 04:14 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 88
T
tnkeeper Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 88
Thanks Paul for the pictures.
It better explains my earlier post.
Alas! My sled is also nothing but a sliver.

Debbie

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15902 12/06/98 03:12 PM
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 140
A
AlanBeckman Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 140
At an event in Tennessee I asked Bill Younger what the red thing under the tree was. He said it is a sled. Originally there was to be a sled under the bare tree but the sled was supposed to be removed when the new tree was added. I don't know how many have the sled but mine does (#158) and I have seen two in local stores (numbers around 650). This might be another Gray's Harbor situation.

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15903 12/12/98 07:25 PM
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1
O
Old Salt Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
O
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1
I read elsewhere that the trees were removed by staff at HL headquarters (no small task considering 10,000 pieces had to be re-forested). So I imagine that each and every piece is a bit unique.

Bill - in VA

[This message has been edited by Old Salt (edited 12-12-98).]


Bill in VA
The Old Salt
Re: Old Field Pt Question #15904 12/12/98 09:11 PM
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 13
W
Walt Mills Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
W
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 13
Well the little red sled is on my piece #9726. Paul what did you use to get the great closeups?

Re: Old Field Pt Question #15905 12/14/98 05:11 PM
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 44
S
Squid Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 44
Just picked up my new x-mas piece yesterday & the sled is hardly visible (#2556). Kind of a disappointing, but Old Field is still a nice piece.


Moderated by  rscroope 

Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics16,978
Posts184,640
Members2,579
Most Online10,155
Jan 14th, 2020
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 1,317 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
SafeHarbor, Toots, Bluffhill, phtate, TexLight2022
2579 Registered Users
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2