Bob,
Here is my list:
Nikon D100 w/MB-D100
Nikon D2H (new)
Promaster AF 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5 MC
Nikkor AF 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 D IF
Nikkor AF 80-200 f/2.8 D ED (2-touch)
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 HSM APO EX (new)
Nikkor 500mm f/8 N Reflex AI-S
Rubinar 500mm f/5.6 Reflex
Tamron AFD 1.4x TC
Kenko-Tokina AFD 2x Teleplus MC7
Most of my shots were taken with the D100 and either the Nikkor 28-105 and 80-200. There were a few shots taken with the Nikor 500 and a few wides with the Promaster.
I bought the D2H 2 weeks ago. Three days after I bought it, Nikon announced its replacement, the D2HS. But for the $1500 difference, I'll keep the D2H. I haven't had much of a chance to use it yet. If you really have money to burn, get the new D2X. 12 mpxls with more bells and whistles you can shake a stick at. Its only $5000 for the body.
Nikon makes some great glass, sharp, fast, and expensive. Sigma makes good lenses too. Just slightly behind Nikon in sharpness and quality IMHO, but much more reasonable prices. Since I shoot digital, I can make up for it in post processing. I don't really have any LH shots using the Sigma 120-300 yet, but I have lacrosse shots using it. Go to http://home.comcast.net/~joewingsphotos/ and look at the top 3 games. The were all shot using the Sigma. The last game was shot using the Nikon 80-200. For more from the Nikon 80-200 go to http://home.comcast.net/~nllbeagle/belmar04/ if you like pro beach volleyball. I can tell you the D100 and D2H are great cameras.
If you really need more pixels, you can always up-sample the image using programs like Genuine Fractals.
Keep in mind one thing... The camera is only a tool. It only captures what the photographer tells it to.